compare · Meridian vs Basin
30 day window
See how you stack up against every competitor in AI answers.
Cited runs the same buyer questions through every AI engine for you and your competitors, and shows the citation gap in one view. Below: Meridian versus Basin, tracked on 80 category prompts.
Pick 2 brands, 3 topics. Report in 24 hours.
Metric
30 day window
Your brand
Meridian
Competitor
Basin
Coverage · mentions by engine
ChatGPTOpenAI
184
218
PerplexityCited with link
146
198
ClaudeAnthropic
92
114
Google AI OverviewsAIO panel
68
112
Quality · how you appear
Share of voicePercentage of category prompts
14.6%
19.1%
Citation rateCited as a link, not just mentioned
28%
34%
Sentiment scoreWeighted across all mentions
+0.68
+0.71
Prompts cited onOut of 80 tracked category prompts
142
168
Freshness · pages picked up
Fresh source pagesNew pages cited in last 30 days
24
38
llms.txt presentCurated map at site root
Not yet
Yes
FAQ schema coveragePercentage of key pages
42%
88%
gaps · where the difference comes from
3 findings
01
Missing citation on 26 top prompts
Basin is cited on 26 category prompts where Meridian is not. Most are questions your buyers ask before considering a shortlist.
+26 prompts to close
02
Thinner source coverage on Perplexity
Perplexity cites 5 Basin pages per prompt on average, versus 2 Meridian pages. Publishing more citable answer pages closes this quickly.
+3 pages per prompt
03
No llms.txt at the root
Google AI Overviews cite Basin on 14 queries where Meridian is missing. Publishing an llms.txt file at the root and adding FAQ schema fixes most.
1 file, fixes 14 queries
customer · basin
read · 20s
We used the Cited comparison report to build our AEO roadmap in one meeting. Three months later, our citation gap versus our top competitor dropped from 30 percent to 4 percent.
Elin Andersson, Head of Growth, Basin
start · free
no card required
Run your first comparison free.
Pick two brands and three topics. Full report delivered in 24 hours.
Or book a demo to walk the report live.